In other words, you’re still kinda delusional if your only standards are that your mate be a single adult.Įven so, the calculator has become a sort of rebuttal for men to use in situations where they think a woman’s standards are too high. In that scenario, the calculator spits out a statistical probability of 45.5 percent, and two out of five bags of cat litter. For example, you could open up the parameters of the search to include any man above the age of 18, and have the only caveat be that he isn’t already married. The only way a third girl could manage to get the calculator to tell her she was “easy to please” is when she listed her only qualification as being at least 5-foot-8.Īs many of my friends and the people discussing the calculator on places like r/PurplePillDebate and the women’s-oriented forum Lipstick Alley have pointed out, it’s really the calculator that seems more delusional than anything else. Another kept her expectations wide, stating she’d be fine with anyone over 5-foot-7 who makes $45,000 or more a year, and who’s between the ages of 26 and 45. I had some of my female friends mess around with the calculator, many of whom were awarded similar titles like “Aspiring Cat Lady.” One friend put in the details of her own husband and got a score of 0.12 percent. A live search through surveys conducted by US Census Bureau and NCHS.- Female Delusion Calculator July 7, 2021 Look no further than the fabulous "Female Delusion Calculator". “That would make it even more hilarious.”Įver wondered how likely is to find a high value man within the U.S. “You should add a slide for the size a guy’s packing in his pants,” a dude who probably has a humiliation fetish wrote. Many also asked that further features be added, like IQ or whether a guy already has children.
When the tool was first introduced in July on Twitter, a few dozen men rallied around it as a valuable way of showing us gals how gosh darn stupid we are for not wanting to date them. Really makes you wonder why women didn’t wanna date this dude. In other words, it was created by a guy who was tired of being turned down by women he deemed “below average,” and felt scorned enough to take the time to design an entire web tool about it. They don’t realize these guys are in high demand.” Below-average women expect their high-quality men to stick around. As the “About” section for the online calculator reads, it was created by a man in “North America” who “couldn’t help noticing that women often have unrealistic expectations about the man they are looking for. The data is sourced from the census and surveys from the National Center for Health Statistics.
Nevertheless, the calculator is evidence of the obsession some men have with the belief that women’s standards are far too high. This figure is also paired with an insult: Thanks to such statistical improbability, the calculator gives me a “delusion score” of four out of five bags of cat litter and the unfortunate title of “Cat Enthusiast.”įortunately, I’m neither single nor a cat owner. Should I dare to be more selective, wanting someone who’s at least 6-feet tall and makes $75,000 a year or more (but otherwise meets the same criteria above), my chances fall to a depressingly slim 1.6 percent. But according to something called the “Female Delusion Calculator,” my odds of finding a man who fits this profile are only 13.6 percent. I don’t consider myself to have a “type.” Demographically, I could see myself dating anyone between the ages of 25 and 40 who isn’t already married, earns at least $45,000 a year (not too unreasonable for New York City, I think) and is 5-foot-8 or taller.
0 kommentar(er)
